Zero Anaphora and Topic Chain: A Cross-Linguistic Study
Abstract
A cognitive-functional framework is explored to account for the occurrence and distribution of zero anaphora and topic chain in discourse. Although traditionally regarded as a unique discourse device for topic-oriented languages, zero anaphora and topic chain seem to manifest cognitive constraints underlying discourse processing and may be governed by universal principles to a certain degree. Based on the cognitive-functional framework, the present study proposes a TOPIC-CHAIN PRINCIPLE, arguing that topic chain encodes a referent that is cognitively most accessible at the moment of discourse production, as enhanced by maximum discourse coherence of topic continuity and thematic coherence. The study demonstrates, using text data from the two historically unrelated, morphosyntactically different languages, Chinese and English, that cognitive accessibility and thematic coherence indeed warrant the use of topic chain in discourse. The structural differences found in the use of zero anaphora between syntactically different languages as discussed in previous studies may be more of clause-level than discourse-level phenomena.
Full Text: PDF
Abstract
A cognitive-functional framework is explored to account for the occurrence and distribution of zero anaphora and topic chain in discourse. Although traditionally regarded as a unique discourse device for topic-oriented languages, zero anaphora and topic chain seem to manifest cognitive constraints underlying discourse processing and may be governed by universal principles to a certain degree. Based on the cognitive-functional framework, the present study proposes a TOPIC-CHAIN PRINCIPLE, arguing that topic chain encodes a referent that is cognitively most accessible at the moment of discourse production, as enhanced by maximum discourse coherence of topic continuity and thematic coherence. The study demonstrates, using text data from the two historically unrelated, morphosyntactically different languages, Chinese and English, that cognitive accessibility and thematic coherence indeed warrant the use of topic chain in discourse. The structural differences found in the use of zero anaphora between syntactically different languages as discussed in previous studies may be more of clause-level than discourse-level phenomena.
Full Text: PDF
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 153 |
Yesterday | 277 |
This Month | 5686 |
Last Month | 16890 |
All Days | 1247226 |
Online | 8 |